Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Asuka Solo wrote: You mean I could field a cruiser with 24k or more damage.... making super carrier DPS look like child's play.... And you think that's balanced? Its only viable targets are capital ships and its primary target are super ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 21:14:00
|
62. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aglais wrote: Don't ignore the real problem and tell me I'm "living in the past". We don't need to introduce more pointless ships to solve problems that can be fixed in other ways that, to me, make more sense. I'll leave it to you to con...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 18:30:00
|
63. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aglais wrote: What I want to see is that a Titan is a truly rare occurrence and even the very most powerful alliances might ever own two of them at once. And going back to the tradition where titan wrecks become major landmarks in-system. Same ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 17:41:00
|
64. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Larloch TheAncient wrote: LOVE the Idea!!!! Few changes I would suggest. Drop the whole "launch bomb Idea". Your "bomber" has to be manually flown INTO the desired ship. Your of course get destroyed and podded upon impact, plus lose a...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 17:15:00
|
65. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Vulfen wrote: your idea is too flawed there is no way you can introduce a subcap hull that does more damage than a dread which is basically what you asking. id rather see a change to the current stealth bomber. ie; increase bomb launcher capac...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 15:40:00
|
66. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Spugg Galdon wrote: I'd prefer it to be a T2 destroyer hull though. Using the new Dessy hulls Oh, and not fully covert but able to blops bridge in. The hull chosen isnt really the big issue, although I think art would have something to say...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 14:54:00
|
67. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nariya Kentaya wrote: Right, straight off here, your giving it to a NEW cruiser hull, and giving the hull BARELY any tank, and it STILL has to be deployed, and used, en masse, to easily kill capitals? why not just spam T3's then? at least they ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 13:09:00
|
68. Idea: The Strategic bomber - the hero EVE deserves - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Super Capital proliferation in EVE is a problem that threatens to destabilize the core game itself if allowed to continue at current pace. The main problem is that super capitals GÇô although easy enough to kill when encountered alone GÇô are all ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.24 11:51:00
|
69. Team Avatar and the future of our prototype - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This thread was obviously thought to be controversial, so unifex had to come out and endorse it :) CCP, I think you have the playerbase a bit wrong here. The majority of the playerbase is not opposed to avatar gameplay, in fact I think most of us...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.10.09 19:13:00
|
70. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Liang Nuren wrote: The Caldari destroyer gets almost 80% more alpha than today's AML Caracal, and applies it better as well. It also gets really fantastic range, which means that it's able to t...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.28 20:32:00
|
71. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
serras bang wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Ahem. Even with a reduced PG on the missile launchers, a destroyer pilot with maxed out fitting skills will have only 5,85 PG left after fitting 8 light launchers... So no speedmod. Or tank. Intenti...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.28 19:41:00
|
72. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Liang Nuren wrote: The Caldari destroyer gets almost 80% more alpha than today's AML Caracal, and applies it better as well. It also gets really fantastic range, which means that it's able to take advantage of the full range of overheated bon...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.28 19:38:00
|
73. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: CALDARI DESTROYER: Missiles, missiles, missiles, missiles, that's what this hull is all about. It spams missiles a quite a long range, and boasts improved explosion velocity to catch those pesky annoying little orbit...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.28 19:27:00
|
74. Five ships you love the look of and Five ships you think are ugly! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Love: New Vagabond Rifter Abbadon Punisher Nemesis Hate: Bantam Imicus Bellicose Caracal Brutix
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.24 01:15:00
|
75. New (incomplete) Tempest model on Duality - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tarn Kugisa wrote: is that a minmatar ship or caldari ship? I can't tell Really? For me the wingy bits made that very clear. This model isnt textured, but all in all we are seeing a "less spiky" minmatar line developing. Completed ships in ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.19 23:28:00
|
76. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ensign X wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Ensign X wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Allright. Compared to beam lasers, the nerfed HMLs will deliver almost twice as much effective DPS. Compared to Artillery, the nerfed HMLs will deliver 3.5...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.18 19:27:00
|
77. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Ensign X wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Allright. Compared to beam lasers, the nerfed HMLs will deliver almost twice as much effective DPS. Compared to Artillery, the nerfed HMLs will deliver 3.5 times the effective DPS with 80% of the artil...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.18 19:21:00
|
78. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aglais wrote: LtCol Laurentius wrote: Actually, when you look at effective (as opposed to theoretical) DPS against 200 m/sec moving targets of equal (cruiser) size, the numbers still come out with an advantage to HMLs even after the nerf, ...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.18 19:08:00
|
79. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Etheoma wrote: HERE COMES THE NERF BATE AGAIN; AND OH NOOOOOO! THEY TOOK A SWING AT THE HEAVY MISSILES! 20% damage decrease wtf I get the range decrease and would have been disappointed but also would have seen why if they left it at that BUT...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.18 18:52:00
|
80. Sticky:[Winter] Attack Cruisers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Overall I think this is certainly an improvement over the current state of affairs. Attack cruisers are meant to be hit and run types of ships, providing excellent range control, speed and agility over tank and dps (which is the realm of the comba...
- by LtCol Laurentius - at 2012.09.18 13:36:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |